🔗 Share this article

Over an extended period, threatening communications recurred. At first, reportedly from an ex-law enforcement official and a retired army general, and then from the police themselves. Ultimately, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh claims he was summoned to the police station and warned explicitly: keep quiet or face serious consequences.

This third-generation resident is part of a group opposing a high-value project where Dharavi – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – will be razed and redeveloped by a large business group.

"The culture of Dharavi is unparalleled in the world," states Shaikh. "Yet they want to destroy our community and stop us speaking out."

Contrasting Realities

The narrow alleys of this community stand in sharp opposition to the high-rise structures and Bollywood penthouses that dominate the settlement. Residences are constructed informally and typically missing basic amenities, informal businesses produce dangerous fumes and the atmosphere is permeated by the suffocating smell of exposed drainage.

Among some individuals, the promise of Dharavi transformed into a developed area of high-end towers, neat parks, modern retail complexes and residences with two toilets is an aspirational dream achieved.

"There's no sufficient health services, paved pathways or drainage and we have no places for children to play," states a chai seller, in his fifties, who migrated from his home state in the early eighties. "The sole solution is to demolish everything and build us new homes."

Community Resistance

However, some, including Shaikh, are resisting the plan.

All recognize that Dharavi, historically ignored as an illegal encroachment, is desperately requiring investment and development. But they fear that this initiative – without resident participation – might turn premium city property into a playground for the rich, forcing out the lower-caste, immigrant populations who have been there since generations ago.

These were these excluded, relocated individuals who established the uninhabited area into a frequently examined example of community resilience and economic productivity, whose output is valued at between one million dollars and two million dollars annually, making it a major unregulated sectors.

Relocation Worries

Out of about one million people living in the packed sprawling neighborhood, less than 50% will be able for alternative accommodation in the project, which is estimated to take a significant period to accomplish. Others will be moved to wastelands and saline fields on the far outskirts of the metropolis, threatening to divide a generations-old social network. Some will be denied housing at all.

Those allowed to remain in the neighborhood will be given units in tower blocks, a significant rupture from the organic, communal way of living and working that has supported Dharavi for generations.

Businesses from garment work to ceramic crafts and waste processing are projected to reduce in scale and be relocated to a specific "business area" far from people's residences.

Livelihood Crisis

For those such as the leather artisan, a workshop owner and multi-generational resident to reside in the slum, the redevelopment presents an existential threat. His makeshift, three-storey facility creates leather coats – tailored coats, suede trenches, decorated jackets – sold in high-end shops in upscale neighborhoods and overseas.

His family dwells in the spaces downstairs and laborers and sewers – laborers from north India – live on-site, permitting him to sustain operations. Outside Dharavi's enclave, housing costs are often significantly as high for a single room.

Pressure and Coercion

In the official facilities nearby, an illustrated mock-up of the Dharavi project depicts a contrasting outlook. Well-groomed residents gather on bicycles and eco-friendly transport, acquiring continental baguettes and pastries and enlisting beverages on a patio near a restaurant and treat station. This represents a world away from the 20-rupee idli sambar first meal and 5-rupee chai that sustains local residents.

"This represents no improvement for residents," explains Shaikh. "It represents an enormous property transaction that will make it unaffordable for our community to continue."

Additionally, there exists concern of the corporate group. Run by a powerful tycoon – one of India's most powerful and an associate of the government head – the conglomerate has been subject to claims of crony capitalism and ethical concerns, which it disputes.

Although local authorities describes it as a partnership, the developer invested nearly a billion dollars for its majority share. A case alleging that the redevelopment was questionably assigned to the business group is under review in the top court.

Ongoing Pressure

Since they began to actively protest the project, Shaikh and other residents claim they have been experienced a long-running campaign of coercion and warning – involving messages, explicit warnings and implications that opposing the initiative was equivalent to opposing national interests – by people they assert represent the developer.

Among those accused of making intimidations is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c