🔗 Share this article

Recently, the game developers introduced a new playlist titled Relaxed Breakthrough. To put it simply, this mode resembles the standard Breakthrough setup but features several key adjustments:

• Each team has only 8 human participants, with the remaining made up of 32 bots.
• Activities done by real players grant complete experience points, while AI activities offer lower rewards.
• Only two maps are available: Siege of Cairo and Empire State.
• Features like Dogtags, achievements, and stat tracking are disabled.

In short, the playlist delivers on its name: it offers a laid-back version of Breakthrough. At face value, you might think there's nothing wrong, since it gives additional choices for gamers seeking alternative ways to enjoy the title. However, gaming history has shown one thing, it is that you can't please everyone. In other words, a lot of BF6 fans are mad.

Community Reactions: Anger to Praise

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Don't repeat the errors of your competitors," reads a response to the official announcement. "Absolutely shocking idea," says a different user. At the same time, on the Battlefield subreddit, a player remarks, "I have no idea where we are going with this game," and another lists all the issues they consider to be problematic in Battlefield 6: "Fix bugs, fix drone glitch, fix IVF rockets, adjust aiming after sprinting, improve hit detection. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, for every complaint, there are players sharing how much they're enjoying the new mode. "It's enjoyable to warm up, real players keep it from being a complete grind but it's quite laid-back," says one Reddit comment. "This subreddit fails to see that there are gamers who actually go outside and can't play this game 24/7. Allow them to find a middle ground," states another. One reply via social media clarifies that as they're "a parent gamer with busy schedules, this is great for me," and another praises the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Constructive Criticisms and Player Input

All that said, players have constructive reasons to complain about the new mode. A few folks have pointed out that it will make wait times even longer for different playlists because of the large amount of playlists currently available. On a similar note, certain regions already encounter AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. It also seems somewhat counterintuitive that the mode does not begin without a minimum number of human gamers, despite it primarily centers on combat against bots.

Lastly, a major complaints is that Battlefield Portal was promised to offer full XP, even against bots, but that got canned when they attempted to remove bot farms from the mode. So this new playlist seems like the community meeting them in the middle, according to a Reddit comment. Another labels this mode as the developers "making a mistake so hard, I had so much fun in the initial release, why did they feel the need to adjust it?"

Future Prospects: Will Changes Occur?

Should Battlefield Studios has demonstrated something so far with the latest installment, it is that they're paying attention and responding to player input. Tasks that were overly hard got fixed rapidly, as did the required Redsec challenges. Chances are that, should analytics shows this new playlist is underperforming to their expectations, they will not hesitate to make further modifications.